Audio Levels and Metering BY
KENNETH HUNOLD
It has been said
that television without sound is a stand-by slide. While that statement may be an
exaggeration, sound is an important part of the TV experience. Audio has become
ubiquitous, and everyone seems to think they're an expert on the subject. There are almost
as many opinions on how to meter and monitor audio signals as there are audio engineers.
Audio people criticize TV audio products for their audio omissions, while video people
bemoan the multitude of standards used on the audio side of the house. At the risk of
offending or contradicting engineers on either side of the continent, a few suggestions
about audio levels and metering follow. THE
HISTORY OF STANDARDS First, let's look at
how early standards developed. Audio transmission (in broadcasting) evolved from the
telephone industry. Balanced audio transmission and the 60052 impedance were developed by
the long-distance telephone industry and were often incorporated into broadcast facility
designs. Transmission-Line Theory was cited to require impedance matching for maximum
power transmission from source to load. The unit of measure was the Watt, and audio
signals were measured by comparing them with a reference power level of 1mW into 60052.
The ratio of any power to the reference power was given in decibels. The difference
between the measured power and the reference power of 1mW was assigned the unit dBm. A
common operating reference level was 8dB above 1mW into 60052, or +BdBm. Today, power-matched
audio transmission has been replaced by a voltage based interfaced system where source
impedances are kept low. Most loads bridge the source rather than terminate it, and they
do not draw significant power from the source. The term dBu describes this new measurement
and is defined as decibels unterminated. To maintain some continuity with the older dBm
notation, OdBu was defined as the voltage across a 60052 load when it is dissipating 1mW =
0.77459V (often rounded to 0.775V). In North America and
Japan, the +BdBu reference level has largely been replaced by +4dBu. Often, as facilities
change from power-matched transmission to voltage-based transmission or when they convert
to digital audio distribution, the reference level is simultaneously changed to +4dBu. The
new level allows sufficient headroom (approximately 20dB) with popular IC devices using
power supplies of - 15V. METERING
DEVICES AND STANDARDS Metering, both for
calibration and operation (gain riding), is an area in which multiple standards coexist.
The traditional method of metering/monitoring audio signals was the VU meter. Learning how
to "ride" audio level is an acquired skill. It is sometimes difficult to
interpret the movement of a VU meter, and instructing operators how to set program levels
based on its readings can give greatly varying results. The peak program meter (PPM) was
developed to offer a better indication of program loudness and to aid in more uniform
loudness settings. But old ways die hard. If there is a VU meter somewhere in the room,
many operators will, almost subconsciously, glance at it occasionally as a sort of reality
check during a session or show. With the
proliferation of solid-state metering devices, the ballistics, or movements, are often not
obvious and may not represent a known standard. To that end, you may have to look at the
configuration of the meters and make some choices. If the meter in question has only a few
segments above the lineup level (the level you set your reference tone to), assume that
the display has W-type ballistics. Such a meter would not let you see the peak level of
the signal, but it would keep the display from coaxing out on audio peaks. Conversely, if
the meter has much room above the lineup level, it could be easier to see the peak levels
of the program. However, electronic meters can turn on and off again too quickly. In this
case, a peak-hold feature can be used to hold the highest level for a second or two to
ensure that operators do not miss it. Some electronic meters allow the scale resolution to
be increased for greater precision when setting levels. Then, after level setting is
completed, the scale resolution can be reduced to allow a greater range of audio levels to
be indicated. No metering
technology can guarantee proper levels under all conditions. The best solution is the
intelligent interpretation of the meter display by a quality processor-the human brain.
Unfortunately, even this analog computer can suffer from bad "programming." |